dave
05-29-2003, 07:56 AM
Sutton will keep printing it till Reader’s Digest calls him again. Page after sleep inducing page all saying the same thing: Goodloe is in love with Pat Vice. Well, maybe not in those exact words. According to Sutton, the Linden City Council illegally stripped Pat Vice of his hiring/firing powers as Mayor of Linden. He has repeatedly cited the same Code of Alabama; section 11-43D-15. It goes like this:
Noninterference of Council with administrative services.
Neither the council or any of it’s members shall direct or request the appointment of any person to, or his removal from, office or position by the mayor or by any of his subordinates, or in any manner take part in the appointment or removal of officers and employees in the administrative service of the city. Except for the purpose of inquiry, the council and its members shall not deal with the administrative service solely through the mayor and neither the council or any member thereof may give orders to any subordinates of the mayor, either publicly or privately.(Acts 1989, No. 89-750, 15.)
Since I’m as much a lawyer as Goodloe is I’ll give my opinion as to how the council can justify doing what it did and still be legal. What the code says to me is basically the council cannot hire or fire anyone. It does not say the Mayor is not subject to being stripped of his powers. The council didn’t take the powers to use them, but rather gave the powers to the heads of the departments. This makes sense since the department heads would know more about their employees than anyone else would. All the council members voted unanimously, and the City Attorney states the decision is legal. The only ones saying it’s not are Pat Vice himself and Goodloe Sutton, who prints pictures of dead or dying kids to sell more papers. Who would you believe?<br>The Code of Alabama can be seen here. (http://www.legislature.state.al.us/CodeofAlabama/1975/coatoc.htm)
More talk about money in the Commission.
<p>During a work session, the County Commission discussed how to generate more revenue for the County. The main issue at hand is the County courthouse, which is falling apart; the roof and electrical system being of top priority. Some of the suggestions put out were a one cent sales tax increase, an increase on ad valorem tax (property), a gasoline tax, a 5 cent tax on cigarettes, and a tax on soft drinks. Ken Tucker once again stated his position on adding taxes; the public should vote on all new taxes. He suggested increasing court costs and fees, letting the crooks using the courthouse pay for it themselves. At any rate, look for taxes to be raised in the state and county levels. One other expensive venture looming that wasn’t mentioned is the lawsuit against the County brought by BWWMH to force the County to pay for indigent care. I guess the ostrich effect will work for that a little while longer anyway.</p>
Noninterference of Council with administrative services.
Neither the council or any of it’s members shall direct or request the appointment of any person to, or his removal from, office or position by the mayor or by any of his subordinates, or in any manner take part in the appointment or removal of officers and employees in the administrative service of the city. Except for the purpose of inquiry, the council and its members shall not deal with the administrative service solely through the mayor and neither the council or any member thereof may give orders to any subordinates of the mayor, either publicly or privately.(Acts 1989, No. 89-750, 15.)
Since I’m as much a lawyer as Goodloe is I’ll give my opinion as to how the council can justify doing what it did and still be legal. What the code says to me is basically the council cannot hire or fire anyone. It does not say the Mayor is not subject to being stripped of his powers. The council didn’t take the powers to use them, but rather gave the powers to the heads of the departments. This makes sense since the department heads would know more about their employees than anyone else would. All the council members voted unanimously, and the City Attorney states the decision is legal. The only ones saying it’s not are Pat Vice himself and Goodloe Sutton, who prints pictures of dead or dying kids to sell more papers. Who would you believe?<br>The Code of Alabama can be seen here. (http://www.legislature.state.al.us/CodeofAlabama/1975/coatoc.htm)
More talk about money in the Commission.
<p>During a work session, the County Commission discussed how to generate more revenue for the County. The main issue at hand is the County courthouse, which is falling apart; the roof and electrical system being of top priority. Some of the suggestions put out were a one cent sales tax increase, an increase on ad valorem tax (property), a gasoline tax, a 5 cent tax on cigarettes, and a tax on soft drinks. Ken Tucker once again stated his position on adding taxes; the public should vote on all new taxes. He suggested increasing court costs and fees, letting the crooks using the courthouse pay for it themselves. At any rate, look for taxes to be raised in the state and county levels. One other expensive venture looming that wasn’t mentioned is the lawsuit against the County brought by BWWMH to force the County to pay for indigent care. I guess the ostrich effect will work for that a little while longer anyway.</p>